Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () ranum com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:53:23 -0400
Ionut Boldizsar wrote:
I somehow believe that security related software should be update/maintained as much as possible.
I think the industry places entirely the wrong emphasis on updating and patching software. I believe that security related software should never need patching or updating. If you're exposing software to the Internet and you know it's such a buggy wad of tripe that it needs a patch once a month - you're using the wrong software and you need to re-assess your overall system design. mjr. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers, (continued)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Carson Gaspar (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Paul Melson (Jul 21)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers David Lang (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Keith A. Glass (Jul 22)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 22)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Keith A. Glass (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Paul Melson (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Sawyer, Christopher (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Paul Melson (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Ionut Boldizsar (Jul 25)
- Message not available
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 25)
- Message not available