Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld
From: Chris Wysopal <weld () vulnwatch org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:26:26 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Marchand, Tom wrote:
If the bug was found by disassembling Sybase's code then Sybase probably does have a legal position to do this. I haven't read Sybase's EULA but most have a provision prohibiting reverse engineering of code.
It is certainly possible to discover security flaws without reverse engineering. You don't need to get to the point where you know how the internals of a program are built. Injecting crafted data into a program's inputs and observing whether or not it crashes or misbehaves is simply using the program. If it is decided by the courts that all security analysis is covered by a blanket EULA no reverse engineering provision, a potential solution for security researchers is to require that the vendor indemnify them from reverse engineering civil suits before disclosing information them. -Chris
Current thread:
- RE: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Marchand, Tom (Mar 22)
- Re: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld sean (Mar 22)
- Re: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Peter J. Holzer (Mar 23)
- RE: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Chris Wysopal (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Marchand, Tom (Mar 22)
- Re: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Simple Nomad (Mar 23)
- Re: Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Jay Libove (Mar 23)
- Re: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld Simple Nomad (Mar 23)
- RE: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld http-equiv () excite com (Mar 23)
- Re: [VulnWatch] Details of Sybase ASE bugs withheld sean (Mar 22)