oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: openjpeg: incorrect fix for CVE-2013-6045 (was Re: openjpeg CVE-2016-3181, CVE-2016-3182 .. and CVE-2013-6045)
From: Doran Moppert <dmoppert () redhat com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:46:27 +1030
Do you specifically know of a distribution that still has that patch?Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Ubuntu LTS seem to be still carrying the original patch. Possibly others, but these are the only ones I've identified.
I should have included this reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382202 -- Doran Moppert Red Hat Product Security
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: openjpeg CVE-2016-3181, CVE-2016-3182 .. and CVE-2013-6045 Raphael Geissert (Oct 05)
- CVE request: openjpeg: incorrect fix for CVE-2013-6045 (was Re: openjpeg CVE-2016-3181, CVE-2016-3182 .. and CVE-2013-6045) Doran Moppert (Oct 05)
- Re: CVE request: openjpeg: incorrect fix for CVE-2013-6045 (was Re: openjpeg CVE-2016-3181, CVE-2016-3182 .. and CVE-2013-6045) Doran Moppert (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: openjpeg CVE-2016-3181, CVE-2016-3182 .. and CVE-2013-6045 cve-assign (Nov 29)
- CVE request: openjpeg: incorrect fix for CVE-2013-6045 (was Re: openjpeg CVE-2016-3181, CVE-2016-3182 .. and CVE-2013-6045) Doran Moppert (Oct 05)